Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: FW: [gentoo-alt] portage problems...
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:39:35
Message-Id: 1214483968.28954.296.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: FW: [gentoo-alt] portage problems... by Fabian Groffen
1 On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 14:21 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
2 > On 26-06-2008 12:54:14 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
3 > > > I've never seen it before. Could it be some dirty upgrade-path
4 > > > problem?
5 > >
6 > > Maybe yes, I haven't seen it now anymore.
7 > >
8 > > And: portage does work _only_ with cPickle, not with pickle... I ruined another prefix, by simply doing update world, since portage is updated before python... AAAARRR...
9 >
10 > That must be some old portage then? I know zmedico put some efforts in
11 > getting bash and python to be emerged before portage, but portage also
12 > asap before any other packages.
13
14 I get this....
15
16 These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
17
18 Calculating dependencies... done!
19
20 [ebuild U ] sys-apps/portage-2.2.00.10788 [2.2.00.10770]
21 *** Portage will stop merging at this point and reload itself,
22 then resume the merge.
23 [ebuild U ] app-admin/python-updater-0.5 [0.4]
24 [ebuild N ] virtual/editor-0
25 [ebuild N ] virtual/pager-0
26 [ebuild U ] dev-lang/python-2.5.2-r5 [2.5.2-r4]
27
28 So portage is going to be emerged first.
29
30 Alan.
31
32 --
33 gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list