1 |
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 14:21 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
> On 26-06-2008 12:54:14 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
3 |
> > > I've never seen it before. Could it be some dirty upgrade-path |
4 |
> > > problem? |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Maybe yes, I haven't seen it now anymore. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > And: portage does work _only_ with cPickle, not with pickle... I ruined another prefix, by simply doing update world, since portage is updated before python... AAAARRR... |
9 |
> |
10 |
> That must be some old portage then? I know zmedico put some efforts in |
11 |
> getting bash and python to be emerged before portage, but portage also |
12 |
> asap before any other packages. |
13 |
|
14 |
I get this.... |
15 |
|
16 |
These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
17 |
|
18 |
Calculating dependencies... done! |
19 |
|
20 |
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/portage-2.2.00.10788 [2.2.00.10770] |
21 |
*** Portage will stop merging at this point and reload itself, |
22 |
then resume the merge. |
23 |
[ebuild U ] app-admin/python-updater-0.5 [0.4] |
24 |
[ebuild N ] virtual/editor-0 |
25 |
[ebuild N ] virtual/pager-0 |
26 |
[ebuild U ] dev-lang/python-2.5.2-r5 [2.5.2-r4] |
27 |
|
28 |
So portage is going to be emerged first. |
29 |
|
30 |
Alan. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |