1 |
On 25-03-2009 08:38:53 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
2 |
> Fabian Groffen wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> <snip - I agree with the rest or don't have a comment> |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > In both cases, Prefix can adapt, but Prefix is not brought any closer to |
7 |
> > gentoo-x86 IMO by using either of both proposals, since gentoo-x86 |
8 |
> > doesn't follow it! |
9 |
> |
10 |
> With my original proposal here, we are very much closer to gentoo-x86 |
11 |
> because instead of adding another global scope variable (or changing |
12 |
> keywords), we just need to add prefix profiles - which we will anyway. |
13 |
|
14 |
Yes, but if we kill prefix from EAPI, we will be there without any |
15 |
policy change. |
16 |
|
17 |
If we would also change all ED into $D$EPREFIX inheriting prefix.eclass |
18 |
would do the trick entirely and we could merge back. |
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Fabian Groffen |
23 |
Gentoo on a different level |