Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Derek Harland <derek@××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Creating new ebuilds for Gentoo Prefix
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 07:27:55
Message-Id: FD1A2153-0EEC-4860-8D88-FB99BE15A596@chocolate-fish.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] Creating new ebuilds for Gentoo Prefix by Matt Michalowski
1 At the moment my main OSX box is running 10.4 with software installed
2 by macports. I also have a 10.5 box that has no non-apple software
3 installed yet ... so I'm potentially interested in gentoo-prefix on
4 either 10.4 or 10.5
5
6 Macports applies a number of patches to both python2.4 and 2.5
7 sources to build them ... some of which are 10.5 specific patchs ...
8 perhaps those could be helpful?
9
10 Related ... does anyone know how Gentoo itself solves the problem of
11 multiple python versions with regards to external libraries ... eg
12 for numpy, macports requires two near identical portfiles (ebuilds),
13 one for each version of python
14
15 [obviously it would be useful for me to build a Gentoo VM somewhere
16 so I can see how Gentoo itself works ...]
17
18 des.
19
20
21 On 14/07/2008, at 6:49 PM, Matt Michalowski wrote:
22
23 > Fabian Groffen wrote:
24 >> If you really need it, we'll have to revive it again. I dropped the
25 >> 2.4 series when the 2.5 series were doing fine in Prefix, because
26 >> Python
27 >> is a downright hell, and I wanted to avoid maintaining that hell
28 >> where
29 >> not absolutely necessary.
30 >>
31 > Wasn't Python (both 2.4 and 2.5) quite problematic on Leopard, and
32 > Pipping was only able to get 2.5 compiling on Leopard with some
33 > patches pulled from Apple's Darwin 9 sources?
34 > (this is my possibly incorrect recollection of history)
35 >
36 >
37 > Matt.
38 > --
39 > gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list
40 >
41
42 --
43 gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] Creating new ebuilds for Gentoo Prefix Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>