Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-alt
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alt: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: <gentoo-alt@g.o>
From: "Markus Duft" <mduft@g.o>
Subject: RE: emake shell
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:39:59 +0100
> 
> On 16-01-2009 15:09:21 +0100, Markus Duft wrote:
> > > > Please speak up, if you _don't_ want me to do this as a portage
> patch
> > > in the
> > > > prefix tree. That's what I want to do, if nobody has a problem
> with
> > > it ;)
> > >
> > > Please don't.
> >
> > Ok, so what else then?
> 
> Ignore my previous comment.  Don't patch Portage.  I see no problems in
> applying it for every arch.  So just get a patch on my desk so I can
> commit it in Prefix Portage's sources.
> 

Ok, here we go :)

Cheers, Markus

> 
> --
> Fabian Groffen
> Gentoo on a different level

Attachment:
portage-emake-shell.patch (Binary data)
Replies:
Re: RE: emake shell
-- Fabian Groffen
References:
emake shell
-- Markus Duft
RE: emake shell
-- Markus Duft
Re: emake shell
-- Fabian Groffen
RE: emake shell
-- Markus Duft
Re: emake shell
-- Fabian Groffen
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alt: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: emake shell
Next by thread:
Re: RE: emake shell
Previous by date:
Re: emake shell
Next by date:
Re: RE: emake shell


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-alt mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.