Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-alt
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alt: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-alt@g.o
From: Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>
Subject: Re: [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?)
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:34:37 -0500
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Markus Duft <mduft@g.o> wrote:
> this whole proposal would fix multiple problems:
>
> 1) main and prefix keywords are different, but thats ok if prefix
> keywords are PREFIX_KEYWORDS - we could do our own thing here.
>
> 2) it would solve the problem "how does portage know which packages can
> i merge in a prefixed environment" - no need to trigger based on
> inherit, EAPI - or something worse :)
>
> 3) it would ease porting to prefix: simply allow merging main ebeuilds
> in prefix by adding GENTOO to the ACCEPT_DISTRO_KEYWORDS.
>
> 4) it would make gentoo a "real" meta distro as haubi said, since
> gentoo's (linux or prefix) "consumers" can do their own thing with
> keywords completely different from ours. it would be no problem to use -
> for example - keywords like "mduft" and "haubi" (lol), as long as they
> are (fex) SALOMON_KEYWORDS.
>
> what about forwarding this thread to portage-dev@?

I'm having trouble formulating a response to haubi's point because it
is highly divergent to my main goal(s) here.

a) I want non prefix devs[1] to write ebuilds that work in prefix.
But, without knowledge of how Gentoo Prefix works - they shouldn't
need to know.
b) The current strategy of Gentoo Prefix keywords is if it compiles on
one arch, it generally will compile on the rest. (Not always true, but
mostly true)

So, in response to the above points. If we had PREFIX_KEYWORDS, it
should _default_ to all and then react to a failure. As in:
PREFIX_KEYWORDS="* -x86-interix"

-Jeremy

[1]: There is no way that the current Prefix dev team can handle all
the ebuilds in the main tree. We need to leverage work that other
people are already doing - similar to the way linux prefix profiles
are inheriting gentoo-x86 profiles. We use the {x86,amd64,ia64} arch
teams work to save us from duplicating it.


Replies:
Re: [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?)
-- Markus Duft
Re: [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?)
-- Fabian Groffen
References:
[PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?)
-- Jeremy Olexa
Re: [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?)
-- Markus Duft
Re: [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?)
-- Michael Haubenwallner
Re: [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?)
-- Markus Duft
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alt: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?)
Next by thread:
Re: [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?)
Previous by date:
Re: prefix chaining
Next by date:
Re: [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?)


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-alt mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.