On 15-05-2008 10:45:56 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
> Fabian,
> 
> what about the openssh 5.0 mask? Could you check that again, please?
> It even compiles on interix ;) so shouldn't be too much of a problem.
> Also I get the impression that it's not much different from v4.7,
> since nearly all patches/hunks applied unmodified. Which symbols where
> undefined when you tried? What USE flags did you use? Maybe it
> compiles here because I'm missing something you had set.

It massively breaks on Darwin.

> I'd really like to have that on unmasked at least on interix. That
> would give us a large advance over interopsystems, which refuse to
> make their patches for 4.6 open. There would be no more reason to use
> their openssh binary package on interix.

Well, if you test on Linux, Solaris, AIX and HPUX, feel free to unmask
and move the mask to the darwin/macos level.  If Linux and/or Solaris
don't work with it, I feel we should keep it globally masked.


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
-- 
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list