Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabrizio Listello <flistellox@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt][prefix]Ubuntu prefix unable to
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:54:19
Message-Id: 57738f3b0807210854v10c341d6h17ebef1519d7aa71@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt][prefix]Ubuntu prefix unable to by Jeremy Olexa
1 The id command used is the prefixed one (and the other supports -G too).
2 I have no clue...
3
4
5 On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> wrote:
6
7 > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Fabrizio Listello
8 > <flistellox@×××××.com> wrote:
9 > > Hello all,
10 > > I'm trying to have portage-prefix working on Ubuntu.
11 > > I'm been able to bootstrap the whole thing but now I've a problem
12 > upgrading
13 > > the portage package.
14 > >
15 > > emerge -uvD tries to emerge sys-apps/portage-2.2.00.11125.
16 > > The compilation fails with the following error:
17 > >
18 > > checking whether /home/gentoo/usr/bin/id is good enough... configure:
19 > error:
20 > > no doesn't understand -G
21 >
22 > Could you please report if other id's in your PATH don't understand
23 > -G. You can do "type -a id" to see all the available id's then use the
24 > full path to check for -G compatibility. The reason here is because I
25 > would like to know if portage is getting confused with which id it is
26 > using.
27 >
28 > To be honest. I would be very surprised if a modern Ubuntu distro
29 > didn't support -G.
30 >
31 > > in fact the id command supports '-G' and every other option I've found in
32 > > the configure script (see the attached file). I can't figure out where is
33 > > the problem.
34 > >
35 > > Please note that I've installed the prefix as a standard user.
36 >
37 > This is how it is meant to be installed.
38 >
39 > -Jeremy
40 >
41 >
42
43
44 --
45 ---
46 Faber

Attachments

File name MIME type
build.log application/octet-stream
config.log application/octet-stream

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt][prefix]Ubuntu prefix unable to Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>