> 
> Here I go again.
> 
> I wasn't getting anywhere, so I went over to clfs to use as a reference
> to get more GNU programs installed.  The ones they suggest as the ones
> necessary for a clfs system are the ones I installed, only not as a
> cross compiler.  I decided to start over on Gentoo prefix using the
> programs suggested from the Linux From Scratch guys.  No matter what I
> do I get the same error message with...you guessed it.  Gawk

Our AIX machines with prefix-launcher are more or less bare system installations I think, with not much additional software installed/updated.

> 
> gcc  -O2 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED=1 -DGAWK_AIX=1   -o gawk  array.o
> awkgram.o builtin.o dfa.o ext.o field.o gawkmisc.o getopt.o getopt1.o
> io.o main.o msg.o node.o random.o re.o regex.o replace.o version.o
> eval.o profile.o   -ldl
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .pow
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .cos
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .sin
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .atan2
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .sqrt
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .log
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .floor
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .ceil
> ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .exp
> ld: 0711-345 Use the -bloadmap or -bnoquiet option to obtain more
> information.

Shouldn't -lm get on the link line from _somewhere_? What does config.log look like?

> collect2: ld returned 8 exit status
> gmake[2]: *** [gawk] Error 1
> gmake[2]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/local/prefix-launcher-1.2/buildroot/gawk/ibm_slow.powerpc-ibm-
> aix5.2.0.0'
> gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/local/prefix-launcher-1.2/buildroot/gawk/ibm_slow.powerpc-ibm-
> aix5.2.0.0'
> gmake: *** [all] Error 2
> gmake: ***
> [/usr/local/prefix-launcher-1.2/buildroot/gawk/gawk.ibm_slow.powerpc-
> ibm-aix5.2.0.0.builded]
> Error 1
> 
> 
> This is using the prefix-launcher that downloads the programs instead
> of
> including them.  Am I forever doomed by the AIX linker?

Download instead of include? I don't understand your point here... including the sources would make it bigger, including the binaries is not possible :) Or did you mean something else?

Cheers, Markus

> 
> 
> 
> Greg Trigg
> 
> Jacksonville, AR
> 
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list


--
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list