1 |
>>> Is this behavior intentional? Note that this application are not supposed to be used from command line. |
2 |
>> |
3 |
>> I think it is intentional to at least provide a symlink (or wrapper that |
4 |
>> calls open /path/too/My.app) in usr/bin to the app like it would be |
5 |
>> available on Linux, but there is nothing against building the bundles if |
6 |
>> that actually makes it work right. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I guess something is wrong in qt4.eclass or mkspec macx-g++ (if it's changed in Gentoo somehow). |
9 |
> Qt projects provide Mac-specific logic, and it works fine when building with official Qt libraries, but IIRC |
10 |
> "manual" building of Qt projects with qmake from Gentoo produces similar "broken" bundles (will check it ASAP) |
11 |
|
12 |
i have noticed that qt with prefix uses the unix install, not the mac |
13 |
way so bundles are not default. i actaully like it this way. perhaps a |
14 |
use flag bundle would be need. ideally your app should work both ways. |
15 |
only exception would user global config files like /etc/foo versus /Library/foo |
16 |
and ~/.foo and ~/Library/foo |
17 |
|
18 |
matt |