| 1 |
On 22-07-2009 08:15:31 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
| 2 |
> > ok - i missed some NEEDED.PFX.1 -> NEEDED.PECOFF.1 renames :) that of |
| 3 |
> > course caused some problems... the attached patch has all this fixed and |
| 4 |
> > is confirmed to work on both interix and winnt now... |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > how should i proceed? i have a commit ready to fire to commit to the |
| 7 |
> > current portage-13830 ebuild (also includes prefix-chaining update). |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> still waiting for your ok to commit :) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
ah. Well, I meant to look at the patch in detail last night, commit it |
| 12 |
and make a new snapshot ... but something came inbetween. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I have to look into detail, because it seems your PECOFF actually has |
| 15 |
exactly the same behaviour as ELF, so I'd like to see if we can make the |
| 16 |
LinkageMapPeCoff a shallow wrapper around the LinkageMap(ELF) one, to |
| 17 |
avoid duplication. Also, I'm not sure if scanpecoff should be in |
| 18 |
Portage, or in a bumped version of pax-utils. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
At the moment I'm trying to open a docx file from Microsoft that should |
| 21 |
be the specification of PECOFF. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 26 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives