Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-alt
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alt: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-alt@g.o
From: Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>
Subject: Re: Best Practice in Adopting New Ebuilds in Prefix
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 23:42:31 -0500
On 08/09/2011 08:31 PM, heroxbd@... wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> I tried 2.0.0_rc1-r1 version in prefix (with the magic of autounmask :D)
> just now. It's still not prefix enabled yet.

Yea, it was poorly tested. Look onto rc2, once that hits the mirrors. We 
are working with the developers more for that one.
-Jeremy

>
> Yours,
> Benda
>
> Jeremy Olexa<darkside@g.o>  writes:
>
>> Correct you are. Without boring you of historical details, the
>> layman-2* ebuilds should be hitting the mirrors soon that more align
>> us with gentoo-x86. Moving forward, there will not be a seperate
>> Gentoo Prefix layman list of overlays.
>



References:
Best Practice in Adopting New Ebuilds in Prefix
-- heroxbd
Re: Best Practice in Adopting New Ebuilds in Prefix
-- Jeremy Olexa
Re: Best Practice in Adopting New Ebuilds in Prefix
-- heroxbd
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alt: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Best Practice in Adopting New Ebuilds in Prefix
Next by thread:
[PREFIX] All ChangeLogs are generated now
Previous by date:
Re: Best Practice in Adopting New Ebuilds in Prefix
Next by date:
Re: Best Practice in Adopting New Ebuilds in Prefix


Updated Jun 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-alt mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.