1 |
Hi Martin, |
2 |
|
3 |
On 21-09-2011 14:06:47 -0400, Martin Luessi wrote: |
4 |
> I just successfully installed a gentoo prefix setup on CentOS (amd64). |
5 |
> I was silly and used "eselect profile" after the instllation and this |
6 |
> seems to have broken the instllation. I tried to fix it by having |
7 |
> "$EPREFIX/etc/make.profile" point to |
8 |
> "$EPREFIX/usr/portage/profiles/prefix/linux/amd64". However, now |
9 |
> portage tries to install masked packages, e.g., |
10 |
> |
11 |
> emerge -a portage |
12 |
> .. |
13 |
> [ebuild N *] sys-apps/sandbox-2.5 USE="(-multilib)" |
14 |
> [ebuild U *] sys-apps/portage-9999 [2.2.01.19295] USE="-python2% -python3%" |
15 |
> |
16 |
> The following keyword changes are necessary to proceed: |
17 |
> #required by sys-apps/portage-9999, required by portage (argument) |
18 |
> >=sys-apps/sandbox-2.5 ** |
19 |
> #required by portage (argument) |
20 |
> >=sys-apps/portage-9999 ** |
21 |
> |
22 |
> On the other hand, if I set "EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--autounmask=n" all |
23 |
> versions of portage seem to be masked. I have not manually unmasked or |
24 |
> masked any packages and have no idea why this is happening. Any tips |
25 |
> on how to fix this are greatly appreciated. |
26 |
|
27 |
I think you messed with your SYNC variable. There is no portage-9999 in |
28 |
the Prefix tree, so I think you synced up a gx86 tree. |
29 |
|
30 |
Make sure portageq envvar SYNC returns a prefix mirror, |
31 |
e.g. rsync://rsync.prefix.freens.org/gentoo-portage-prefix |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Fabian Groffen |
36 |
Gentoo on a different level |