Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Dropping ia64-linux - anyone care?
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:38:38
Message-Id: CAMxqorUe+GqGPN4ir+YbXjZbdjNKH+tQic6uX2mFqTfkKdGS=g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] Dropping ia64-linux - anyone care? by Burcin Erocal
1 On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Burcin Erocal <burcin@××××××.org> wrote:
2 > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:29:00 -0600
3 > Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >> Fabian and I discussed dropping ia64-linux support. Time to face
6 >> reality, we don't use it and we don't test it... Does anyone out there
7 >> care about ia64-linux?
8 >
9 > I do. :)
10 >
11 > There are still many scientific users who have itanium boxes left
12 > around. Even if they are migrating away from them, I'm sure these are
13 > still used if possible.
14 >
15 > I haven't tried prefix on an ia64 box yet. We have one with gentoo on
16 > it already. I can use that if you need someone to test stuff.
17
18 So, the ML is not an extremely popular place to ask such a question
19 with only ~210 people subscribed but I can only assume that it is a
20 good subset of people that rely on Gentoo Prefix for $important
21 reasons (business, personal, etc). With that, there was one response
22 and you haven't even used it yet, Burcin.
23
24 Therefore, I propose to drop the keyword(s) and leave the profiles for
25 now. Similar to what I did for arm-linux. That way, when you get
26 around to trying ia64-linux, you have most of the guts and just need
27 to modify ACCEPT_KEYWORDS, etc.
28
29 Sounds like a fair compromise to me that sets proper expectations for
30 future Gentoo Prefix users.
31 -Jeremy

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] Dropping ia64-linux - anyone care? Burcin Erocal <burcin@××××××.org>