Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Markus Duft <mduft@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: RE: [gentoo-alt] FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:14:40
Message-Id: 012b01c8ee36$13d37910$3b7a6b30$@org
In Reply to: RE: [gentoo-alt] FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue? by Markus Duft
1 >
2 > >
3 > > On 25-07-2008 09:56:23 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
4 > > > BTW. Did you have time to look into the issues with installing
5 > > binpkgs? IIRC
6 > > > I got a message stating something about EPREFIX nor found in some
7 > > dict or
8 > > > so...
9 > >
10 > > zmedico fixed your original error. I didn't check sorry. I'm a bit
11 > > limited with the keyboard for the moment, perhaps can check later.
12 >
13 > If it's fixed i'll try myself again then :)
14
15 I now tried with two portage versions; both give the same result. I'll paste only the one from the latest version...
16
17 mduft gentoo.system $ PKGDIR=/dev/fs/D/FtpRoot/BinPackages/default-prefix/windows/interix/6.0/x86/ emerge -avuK zsh
18 WARNING: repository at /opt/gentoo.system/usr/portage/local/layman/wamas-ie is missing a repo_name entry
19
20 These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
21
22 Calculating dependencies... done!
23 Traceback (most recent call last):
24 File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/bin/emerge", line 20, in <module>
25 retval = _emerge.emerge_main()
26 File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 13427, in emerge_main
27 myopts, myaction, myfiles, spinner)
28 File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 12517, in action_build
29 mydepgraph.display_problems()
30 File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 7436, in display_problems
31 self._show_unsatisfied_dep(*pargs, **kwargs)
32 File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 5138, in _show_unsatisfied_dep
33 pkgsettings, db, pkg_type, built, installed, db_keys)
34 File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 1327, in get_mask_info
35 cpv=cpv, built=built, installed=installed, metadata=metadata)
36 File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 1451, in __init__
37 self.metadata = _PackageMetadataWrapper(self, self.metadata)
38 File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 1564, in __init__
39 self.update(metadata)
40 File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/cache/mappings.py", line 198, in update
41 self[k] = v
42 File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 1567, in __setitem__
43 _PackageMetadataWrapperBase.__setitem__(self, k, v)
44 File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/cache/mappings.py", line 182, in __setitem__
45 setattr(self, self._prefix + k, v)
46 AttributeError: '_PackageMetadataWrapper' object has no attribute '_val_EPREFIX'
47 mduft gentoo.system $ emerge --version
48 WARNING: repository at /opt/gentoo.system/usr/portage/local/layman/wamas-ie is missing a repo_name entry
49 Portage 2.2.00.11187-prefix (default-prefix/windows/interix/6.0/x86, gcc-4.2.4, unavailable, 6.0 x86)
50 mduft gentoo.system $
51
52 Cheers, Markus
53
54 >
55 > Thanks, Markus
56 >
57 > >
58 > >
59 > > --
60 > > Fabian Groffen
61 > > Gentoo on a different level
62 >
63 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue? Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>