Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-alt
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alt: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: <gentoo-alt@g.o>
From: "Markus Duft" <mduft@g.o>
Subject: RE: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:09:00 +0200

 1.1

> 
> >
> > On 25-07-2008 09:56:23 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
> > > BTW. Did you have time to look into the issues with installing
> > binpkgs? IIRC
> > > I got a message stating something about EPREFIX nor found in some
> > dict or
> > > so...
> >
> > zmedico fixed your original error.  I didn't check sorry.  I'm a bit
> > limited with the keyboard for the moment, perhaps can check later.
> 
> If it's fixed i'll try myself again then :)

I now tried with two portage versions; both give the same result. I'll paste only the one from the latest version...

mduft gentoo.system $ PKGDIR=/dev/fs/D/FtpRoot/BinPackages/default-prefix/windows/interix/6.0/x86/ emerge -avuK zsh
WARNING: repository at /opt/gentoo.system/usr/portage/local/layman/wamas-ie is missing a repo_name entry

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/bin/emerge", line 20, in <module>
    retval = _emerge.emerge_main()
  File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 13427, in emerge_main
    myopts, myaction, myfiles, spinner)
  File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 12517, in action_build
    mydepgraph.display_problems()
  File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 7436, in display_problems
    self._show_unsatisfied_dep(*pargs, **kwargs)
  File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 5138, in _show_unsatisfied_dep
    pkgsettings, db, pkg_type, built, installed, db_keys)
  File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 1327, in get_mask_info
    cpv=cpv, built=built, installed=installed, metadata=metadata)
  File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 1451, in __init__
    self.metadata = _PackageMetadataWrapper(self, self.metadata)
  File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 1564, in __init__
    self.update(metadata)
  File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/cache/mappings.py", line 198, in update
    self[k] = v
  File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 1567, in __setitem__
    _PackageMetadataWrapperBase.__setitem__(self, k, v)
  File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/cache/mappings.py", line 182, in __setitem__
    setattr(self, self._prefix + k, v)
AttributeError: '_PackageMetadataWrapper' object has no attribute '_val_EPREFIX'
mduft gentoo.system $ emerge --version
WARNING: repository at /opt/gentoo.system/usr/portage/local/layman/wamas-ie is missing a repo_name entry
Portage 2.2.00.11187-prefix (default-prefix/windows/interix/6.0/x86, gcc-4.2.4, unavailable, 6.0 x86)
mduft gentoo.system $ 

Cheers, Markus

> 
> Thanks, Markus
> 
> >
> >
> > --
> > Fabian Groffen
> > Gentoo on a different level
> 
> 




Replies:
Re: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
-- Fabian Groffen
References:
FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
-- Markus Duft
RE: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
-- Markus Duft
Re: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
-- Fabian Groffen
RE: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
-- Markus Duft
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alt: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
RE: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
Next by thread:
Re: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
Previous by date:
Re: portage bootstrap problem
Next by date:
Re: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?


Oct 11, 2008

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.