Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-alt
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alt: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-alt@g.o
From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
Subject: Re: Proposal: use git instead of rsync for syncing of prefix portage tree
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:55:22 +0100
On 21-01-2012 23:44:18 +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> Advantage: much faster emerge --sync

proof?

> Possible migration path:
> 1) git init in master mirror of prefix portage tree
> 2) deliver files of initial .git repository via rsync

the prefix neither the main tree aren't even in git, so it would only be
artificial bloat that keeps history with a non-existing/hard upgrade
path that's going to disappear as soon as we no longer need our overlay


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
Attachment:
signature.asc (Digital signature)
Replies:
Re: Proposal: use git instead of rsync for syncing of prefix portage tree
-- Konstantin Tokarev
References:
Proposal: use git instead of rsync for syncing of prefix portage tree
-- Konstantin Tokarev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alt: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Proposal: use git instead of rsync for syncing of prefix portage tree
Next by thread:
Re: Proposal: use git instead of rsync for syncing of prefix portage tree
Previous by date:
Re: Proposal: use git instead of rsync for syncing of prefix portage tree
Next by date:
Re: Proposal: use git instead of rsync for syncing of prefix portage tree


Updated Jun 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-alt mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.