Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 15-05-2008 12:05:23 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>> For the ia64-linux I can see some future, as HP pushes the Itanium
>> platform in general, running either HP-UX, Linux or Windows (and even
>> OpenVMS).
>>
>> Although we do not run Linux on ia64 yet, because it is 64bit only
>> (unlike hpux, linux does not support 32bit emulation on ia64 AFAICT), we
>> eventually could switch one of our compile-farm nodes from ia64-hpux to
>> ia64-linux - maybe the cross-compilers would run faster then...
>>
>> But it's ok with me to drop ia64-linux ATM, and to re-add it when there
>> is time to do so.
>
> It will be trivial to do so if that happens. I guess we'll eliminate
> mips-linux and ia64-linux in one go for now then.
I have ia64-linux but not much use for it ATM. We are moving away from
ia64-linux actually. So, tecnically, I *could* support it is any user
wanted it but since no one has spoken yet..drop++.
-Jeremy
--
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list
|
|
