On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Nicolas Pinto <nicolas.pinto@...> wrote:
> I was indeed using USE=vanilla to get gcc 4.5.3 to compile and it
> appears that all my issues where caused by this useflag.
> So I removed this useflag and masked >sys-devel/gcc-4.2.4-r01.
You shouldn't need to mask it (anymore), see bug 289757. Please test
if you have time.
> Thanks a lot!
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Fabian Groffen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On 23-10-2011 23:36:12 -0400, Martin Luessi wrote:
>>> Did you by any chance emerge gcc with the "vanilla" useflag enabled? I
>>> am asking since I had similar problems when I was installing
>>> gentoo-prefix on CentOS a few weeks ago. Gcc 4.5.3 wouldn't compile
>>> without the "vanilla" useflag enabled, so I enabled it. After that
>>> many packages failed to compile since they were being linked against
>>> system libraries instead of the prefix ones. What I did is mask gcc
>>> versions that are too new (>4.2.4 in my case) to be compatible with
>>> the CentOs glibc.
>> Oh, thanks for the hint. I guess we should either mask vanilla, or
>> apply the critial prefix patches for this regardless of USE=vanilla.
>> Mind filing a bug for this?
>> Thanks a lot for the insight!
>> Fabian Groffen
>> Gentoo on a different level
> Nicolas Pinto