On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:52:30 +0200
Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote:

> On 31-08-2011 15:09:45 +0200, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> > > Aha.  That explains.  Now I understand why the fix fixes it as
> > > well. I'll apply it ASAP.  Thanks a lot!
> > 
> > A better fix might be to replace the + at the end of line 163 with
> > \. This way the parser concatenates the strings and we don't
> > introduce an extra operation. :)
> 
> Since I'm a Python n00b, please tell me if
> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commitdiff;h=5551d449dffe531935dcd672f37c5cd3abd55a44;hp=3b74444f6684d7696e549cbdb76b8d1a0795fe2d
> is supposedly what you meant it to be.

Exactly. Next time I'll provide a patch instead of trying to describe
it in words. :)


Burcin