Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-alt
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alt: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-alt@g.o
From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
Subject: [PREFIX] about EAPI="prefix"
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:24:29 +0200
Just a heads up to all wondering.

Two days ago, I was merging Portage updates and found I had conflicts in
the special EAPI=prefix handling within Portage.  Because solving it
seemed like a high investment for something which was about to be
removed anyway, I decided to remove EAPI="prefix" from the entire tree.
As a result, the tree is now EAPI="prefix"-free, mainly because I feel I
have to push out an update to Portage soon, which will no longer support
EAPI="prefix" ebuilds.

Side effect of this probably too impulsive action is that the metadata
generation broke, which is being regenerated as we speak, and that
people who did /not/ upgrade portage will find themselves a bit
isolated.  For those, please update to portage-2.2.00.13286 (exactly
that version), which is the last hybrid Portage in the tree using
 % emerge --nodeps --oneshot =sys-apps/portage-2.2.00.13286


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level


Replies:
Re: [PREFIX] about EAPI="prefix"
-- Fabian Groffen
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alt: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
[prefix] gcc-4.3.3-r2: invalid reference to /libgcc_s.1.dylib; invalid install_name found
Next by thread:
Re: [PREFIX] about EAPI="prefix"
Previous by date:
Re: Mesa header in media-libs/apple-opengl-2
Next by date:
upgrading packages with EAPI=prefix 1?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-alt mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.