1 |
On 20-10-2011 13:05:22 +0200, Burcin Erocal wrote: |
2 |
> > Ok, ED doesn't make a difference here. Can you explain why the host |
3 |
> > system is making world-writable files? What's its rationale to force |
4 |
> > that on you? Can't you really not just sanitise that (your umask?) |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:12:53 +0200 |
7 |
> From: Alexander Dreyer <alexander.dreyer@×××××××××××××××.de> |
8 |
> To: Burcin Erocal <burcin@××××××.org> |
9 |
> Cc: gentoo-alt@l.g.o |
10 |
> Subject: Re: Fw: [gentoo-alt] permission test |
11 |
> |
12 |
> You can change these permissions afterwards, but newly generated files |
13 |
> are world-writable in the first (this is enforced by the file server). |
14 |
> Of course only formally, because the access is restricted by the |
15 |
> toplevel ACLs. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> It would already help me a lot, if the warning would not sleep for a |
18 |
> second. |
19 |
|
20 |
Ok, so would the tradeoff to give a warning and sleep only once (the |
21 |
sleep perhaps is even misplaced here), instead of for every file be |
22 |
acceptable? |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Fabian Groffen |
27 |
Gentoo on a different level |