| 1 |
I've been having the same problems. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I was unable to bootstrap my machine until I masked >=coreutils-7.0. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Aaron |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
On Apr 6, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Steven Parkes wrote: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
>> Yea, there have been conflicting reports of coreutils status. For |
| 11 |
>> example, http://bugs.gentoo.org/264007 - but other people can't |
| 12 |
>> reproduce it. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Hmmm not sure why people can't reproduce, unless it's a new bug in |
| 15 |
> Darwin, because it's definitely a bug in Darwin. I added the details |
| 16 |
> to the ticket. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I don't know the approach to patching such things. Does prefix |
| 19 |
> maintain patches for OS bug workarounds? I know there are patches. |
| 20 |
> Including this kind of thing? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> There are a few possible ways to work around the bug. I put the |
| 23 |
> details in the ticket. Happy to contribute the code ... |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
Archives