Archives
Archives
| From: | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-alt] FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:05:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080725080457.GC17546@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | RE: [gentoo-alt] FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue? by Markus Duft |
||
| 1 | On 25-07-2008 09:56:23 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
| 2 | > BTW. Did you have time to look into the issues with installing binpkgs? IIRC |
| 3 | > I got a message stating something about EPREFIX nor found in some dict or |
| 4 | > so... |
| 5 | |
| 6 | zmedico fixed your original error. I didn't check sorry. I'm a bit |
| 7 | limited with the keyboard for the moment, perhaps can check later. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Fabian Groffen |
| 12 | Gentoo on a different level |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| RE: [gentoo-alt] FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue? | Markus Duft <mduft@g.o> |