| 1 |
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 17:33:55 C. Bergström wrote: |
| 2 |
> Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 18-11-2008 20:48:58 +0100, "C. Bergström" wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> If anyone is interested in sandbox working correctly on (open)solaris |
| 5 |
> >> please give both feedback and any technical details which may help. I'm |
| 6 |
> >> looking into how LD_PRELOAD works and any difference between |
| 7 |
> >> linux/solaris. I tried to compile the alpha version, but didn't read |
| 8 |
> >> the code at all. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Yes, very interesting in having it running. Please look at the current |
| 11 |
> > git sources, which had a recent spike of activity: |
| 12 |
> > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/sandbox.git;a=summary |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Ok. I pulled the latest git work and with a few really dirty hacks to |
| 15 |
> the configure it was rolling.. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> (Here's some of the output of the failure.. I haven't looked at it at all) |
| 18 |
> http://rafb.net/p/fELaK960.html |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
very first rule if you want to make this work: never post log files to an |
| 21 |
external site, especially one like rafb.net where things expire quickly. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
you're hitting an issue with what i hinted at earlier ... symbol versioning. |
| 24 |
iirc, the symbol version script (for our purposes) should be the same between |
| 25 |
the GNU linker and the Solaris linker. but how you tell the linker about the |
| 26 |
version script obviously wont be the same. you'll have to figure that out and |
| 27 |
we can add a configure test to detect the linker in use. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
all those warnings are kind of painful too ... probably have to find a |
| 30 |
autoconf macro for detecting attribute support in the compiler. iirc, glibc |
| 31 |
tends to use __GNUC__ type CPP macros though. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
the memory (xmalloc, etc...) arent too surprising. that's a bit of a mess atm |
| 34 |
and i intend to clean that stuff up anyways ... |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
the symbols.h errors are odd. probably a CPP difference between your compiler |
| 37 |
and the GNU C compiler. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
you should figure out how solaris forces C++ exception handling. clearly it |
| 40 |
doesnt use the same flag as GCC: -fexceptions. that'll have to be turned into |
| 41 |
a configure compiler test as well. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
g'luck ... seems you got your work cut out for you :p |
| 44 |
-mike |
Archives