| 1 |
On 14-05-2008 14:57:30 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
| 2 |
> > |
| 3 |
> > On 14-05-2008 14:10:44 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Phew... I really should write all this down in some document... ;) |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Sounds like it ;) |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > > Any more questions, or did I scare away everybody? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Not yet, but I'm still stuck on my Interix bootstrap having a messed up |
| 11 |
> > binutils... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Why don't you use prefix-launcher? It works... I know, having our own |
| 14 |
> ld/as would be really cool, but that would make much work that I have |
| 15 |
> done already void. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I don't see how that's going to solve my problem of binutils tools (as |
| 18 |
in the ebuild) being compiled such that if you want to run any of its |
| 19 |
tools (e.g. objdump) it traps saying it can't find |
| 20 |
libbfd.so.some.amazingly.long.version.number. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I'm at the stage of being able to emerge packages, but I'm left in the |
| 23 |
dark on how you ever get a working system (with or without |
| 24 |
prefix-launcher ... I believe I'm already "launched"). |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 29 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives