On 27-01-2012 16:15:23 +0100, justin wrote:
> On 27/01/12 15:10, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 27-01-2012 14:32:59 +0100, justin wrote:
> >> As far as I know there will be change for the ordinary usability of the
> >> prefix tree. also for the dev setups I don't see a problem, because the
> >> change allows the lower overlays to find its master, which shouldn't
> >> effect the rsync-tree/prefix-overlay combination as such.
> > 
> > do you overlay on the svn tree, or the prefix rsync tree?
> > 
> > 
> 
> the prefix rsync tree.

ok, the prefix rsync tree has repo_name = gentoo_prefix

the prefix svn tree has no repo_name

(I have it locally, with repo_name set to gentoo)

So you want an alias in the prefix rsync tree to "gentoo"?

hmmm, I don't think that would hurt anyone, does it?



-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level