| 1 |
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 10:14 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 24-04-2008 23:53:51 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Using gcc-config fails compared to what binutils-config does for me. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > It turns out that this fails... |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > env -i portageq envvar CHOST |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > whereas in binutils-config we just do... |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > portageq envvar CHOST |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Doing the former, gives me.... |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > env: /root/gentoo/usr/bin/portageq: Invalid executable file format |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Does your /root/gentoo/usr/bin/portageq have an absolute shebang? Mine |
| 18 |
> does. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Yes. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> > Is there any reason to use "env -i" ?? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> it cleans the environment, probably for that case to avoid garbage (set |
| 25 |
> by the user) to influence portageq's output. Must have been a reason |
| 26 |
> for it at some point. Feels wrong they aren't aligned in |
| 27 |
> binutils-config and gcc-config, though. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Funnily enough. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
env /root/gentoo/usr/bin/portageq - works |
| 32 |
env -i /root/gentoo/usr/bin/portageq - Invalid executable file format |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Alan. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives