1 |
I was indeed using USE=vanilla to get gcc 4.5.3 to compile and it |
2 |
appears that all my issues where caused by this useflag. |
3 |
|
4 |
So I removed this useflag and masked >sys-devel/gcc-4.2.4-r01. |
5 |
|
6 |
Thanks a lot! |
7 |
|
8 |
Regards, |
9 |
|
10 |
Nicolas |
11 |
|
12 |
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
13 |
> On 23-10-2011 23:36:12 -0400, Martin Luessi wrote: |
14 |
>> Did you by any chance emerge gcc with the "vanilla" useflag enabled? I |
15 |
>> am asking since I had similar problems when I was installing |
16 |
>> gentoo-prefix on CentOS a few weeks ago. Gcc 4.5.3 wouldn't compile |
17 |
>> without the "vanilla" useflag enabled, so I enabled it. After that |
18 |
>> many packages failed to compile since they were being linked against |
19 |
>> system libraries instead of the prefix ones. What I did is mask gcc |
20 |
>> versions that are too new (>4.2.4 in my case) to be compatible with |
21 |
>> the CentOs glibc. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Oh, thanks for the hint. I guess we should either mask vanilla, or |
24 |
> apply the critial prefix patches for this regardless of USE=vanilla. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Mind filing a bug for this? |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Thanks a lot for the insight! |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
> -- |
32 |
> Fabian Groffen |
33 |
> Gentoo on a different level |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Nicolas Pinto |
40 |
http://web.mit.edu/pinto |