1 |
On 15-05-2008 08:52:16 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
2 |
> > That feels like an awfully ugly hack. Sorry to say so. Gives me an |
3 |
> > idea on where/why/how though... |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I know it's an ugly hack, yes, and I feel it's really a bug in the |
6 |
> binutils build mechanism, since that should set the rpath correctly |
7 |
> for it's own prefix. But I'm not sure if there wasn't more than just |
8 |
|
9 |
It *does* for Linux and Solaris at least... |
10 |
|
11 |
> binutils requiring the explicit runpath. Also this is just during |
12 |
> bootstrap, so I can cope with that - in the real prefix the |
13 |
> binutils-config does exactly the same thing, so.... |
14 |
|
15 |
Not really. It's just luck it works then. Each binutils should point |
16 |
to its own libs IMO, instead of the libs of the currently selected |
17 |
binutils. |
18 |
|
19 |
For some reason my interix has crippled down to 48K8 modumb speed, where |
20 |
even readline recall (as in arrow up) in bash seems to make the machine |
21 |
go into a hefty calculation session, so if I'm progressing, it is really |
22 |
really REALLY slowly. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Fabian Groffen |
27 |
Gentoo on a different level |
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |