List Archive: gentoo-alt
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 15:30 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 23-10-2009 14:28:17 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 15:14 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > On 23-10-2009 11:00:14 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > > On 23-10-2009 10:15:11 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
> > > > > it seems that the code using os.pipe() seems either broken or the
> > > > > interix implementation of that python code is broken... whichever it is
> > > > > - it's bad ... :(
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you (grobian), please add "Interix" to the existing white list for
> > > > > openpty platforms?
> > > >
> > > > geez... Interix really sucks. Anyway, if you add it to 701, does it
> > > > work then, or does it hang in that case?
> > >
> > > hmm that check in portage looks totally broken to me, and makes
> > > sparc/solaris hang too...
> >
> > Which area is this as I've noticed FreeMiNT's emerging process takes
> > much longer at the moment.
>
> usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/__init__.py
>
> look for openpty
>
> there is a bit of code to test whether this can work or not also
> involving python 3.1
O.k. I'll take a look.
> I also feel everything got slower
It has, most definitely. On slower platforms this can be painful, but
before it was actually quite snappy.
Alan.
|
| Replies: |
Re: portage, openpty and interix
-- Alan Hourihane
|
| References: |
portage, openpty and interix
-- Markus Duft
|
Re: portage, openpty and interix
-- Fabian Groffen
|
Re: portage, openpty and interix
-- Fabian Groffen
|
Re: portage, openpty and interix
-- Alan Hourihane
|
Re: portage, openpty and interix
-- Fabian Groffen
|
| Navigation: |
|
Lists:
gentoo-alt:
< Prev
By Thread
Next >
< Prev
By Date
Next >
|
| Previous by thread: |
| Re: portage, openpty and interix |
| Next by thread: |
| Re: portage, openpty and interix |
| Previous by date: |
| Re: portage, openpty and interix |
| Next by date: |
| Re: portage, openpty and interix |
|