1 |
Mateusz Arkadiusz Mierzwinski wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> 2010/12/9 Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com <mailto:rdalek1967@×××××.com>> |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Frank Peters wrote: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:17:18 -0600 |
9 |
> Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com <mailto:rdalek1967@×××××.com>> wrote: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> What are some things that I should watch for and enable |
13 |
> that isn't so |
14 |
> obvious for someone new to 64 bit? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> The first thing to decide is whether or not you want a pure 64-bit |
18 |
> system or a 64-bit system that keeps 32-bit capability. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I am a purist. I left 32-bit programs in the dust a long time |
21 |
> ago. |
22 |
> But as a consequence there are some things that I will miss |
23 |
> because |
24 |
> they are available in 32-bit packages only. An example would be |
25 |
> Acroread, the PDF viewer, from Adobe. Without Acroread, you will |
26 |
> only view pdf files through the 64-bit xpdf. The Intel C++ |
27 |
> compiler is another example. In fact, most commercial software |
28 |
> that bothers to release a Linux version will do so in 32-bit |
29 |
> format only. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> So if you need to make use of those offerings, you'll need |
32 |
> to keep 32-bit compatibility. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> My own view is that these software developers are way behind |
35 |
> the times and should have long ago made their products in |
36 |
> a 64-bit form. It's not that difficult to do. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Whatever the choice, pure 64-bit or 64/32, Gentoo makes it |
39 |
> easy. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Frank Peters |
42 |
> |
43 |
> |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
> Now I have a question. How do I tell Gentoo to make it pure 64 or |
47 |
> a mix of 32 and 64? I have read about this but I don't think I |
48 |
> have actually seen where it is set. Is it a profile selection, |
49 |
> USE flag or something else? |
50 |
> |
51 |
> If I decide on one then want to switch to the other, does that |
52 |
> require a reinstall or just a change in settings and a recompile |
53 |
> of world? |
54 |
> |
55 |
> Since I use KDE, I always use Okular to view pdf files. I assume |
56 |
> KDE is 64 bit ready. |
57 |
> |
58 |
> Thanks. |
59 |
> |
60 |
> Dale |
61 |
> |
62 |
> :-) :-) |
63 |
> |
64 |
> |
65 |
> You can set it in KERNEL by disabling 32 bit application support and |
66 |
> recompiling GLIBC and GCC without MULTILIB ;). Try also running 32 bit |
67 |
> app. System is not slower or anything else wrong happens. If You drop |
68 |
> 32-bit support You cannot use WINE and load PE32 apps (aka Win32). |
69 |
> |
70 |
> -- |
71 |
> Mateusz Mierzwiński |
72 |
> |
73 |
> Bluebox Software http://www.blueboxsoft.pl/mateusz-mierzwinski |
74 |
|
75 |
I don't use Wine. I have never heard of PE32 so I don't guess I have a |
76 |
need for it either. lol It sounds like I should go pure 64 bit. |
77 |
Anyone disagree with that? Someone mentioned pdf files but I can use |
78 |
KDE's program for that as I do now. I can use OOo as a backup too. |
79 |
|
80 |
Also, there is no server type stuff on here and no plans to install |
81 |
any. It's basically a desktop system built like a freaking tank. Here |
82 |
is a link but I'm not finished yet. I should have a couple more things |
83 |
in there in the next few days. If you look good, you will notice why I |
84 |
can't start the install yet. Hint, something is missing. If you notice |
85 |
it right off, pat yourself on the back. :-D |
86 |
|
87 |
http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/5640/201012070003cutscale.jpg |
88 |
|
89 |
Thanks. |
90 |
|
91 |
Dale |
92 |
|
93 |
:-) :-) |