| 1 |
Sorry, Lack of sleep. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I stand corrected. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Brandon |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:34:33PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:51:58 -0400 |
| 10 |
> Brandon Edens <brandon@××××××.edu> wrote: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> > Using "tweaked out" USE flags will probably not result in hardware |
| 13 |
> > damage. You can break hardware but I don't think you're going to do |
| 14 |
> > it through USE flags. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> 1,$ s/USE/CFLAGS/g |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> USE flag combinations should be ok; if they're not then file a bug. |
| 19 |
> CFLAG problems on the other hand are not so easy to decide - many |
| 20 |
> compiler options are intended only to be used in specific |
| 21 |
> circumstances, not globally for everything. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> Kevin F. Quinn |
Archives