Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Tonko Mulder <tonko.mulder@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Multilib or not?
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:00:59
Message-Id: 1227736848.6272.4.camel@Gaius
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Multilib or not? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 Op woensdag 26-11-2008 om 14:37 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef Duncan:
2 > Tonko <tonko.mulder@×××××.com> posted
3 > 43ba12950811260610i4d8608c0ped540109c51ccd91@××××××××××.com, excerpted
4 > below, on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:10:51 +0100:
5 >
6 > > It looks like I don't use any 32 bit app so I made the switch to the
7 > > no-multilib profile.
8 > > Only 1 question remains (atm actually :P) : Can I just remove the /lib32
9 > > and the /usr/lib32 dirs?
10 >
11 > You should be able to, yes. I'd check first to see if any package still
12 > owns them, just to be sure:
13 >
14 > equery belongs lib32
15 >
16 > If that returns anything, either unmerge or remerge (again?) the returned
17 > package under the new profile, and it /should/ no longer own it. Once
18 > nothing owns it, it should be safe to delete without issue.
19 >
20 Only glibc owned some of it. I moved the dirs to my root homedir Just in
21 case. After some while they'll disappear ;)
22
23 As a result of the switch my lvm2 init script started complaining that
24 it is written for baselayout 2 (which I'm running by the way) and fails
25 to start.
26 I re-emerged lvm2, but that didn't help.
27
28 So any suggestions? Besides not using lvm2 :P

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Multilib or not? Beso <givemesugarr@×××××.com>