| 1 |
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 13:52, "Hemmann, Volker Armin" |
| 2 |
<volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] |
| 3 |
First Impressions': |
| 4 |
> frename-registers, |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I have it, it's good especially for 64-bit code where we have a lot of |
| 7 |
registers. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> fweb |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Ditto. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> ftracer. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I use it and... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> But don't complain, if |
| 18 |
> something does not built |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I'm having no (compiler-related) problems so far, even on ~amd64. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I also like: |
| 23 |
funit-at-a-time, funswitch-loops, and fprefetch-loop-arrays |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
"If there's one thing we've established over the years, |
| 27 |
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest |
| 28 |
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability." |
| 29 |
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives