1 |
On Thursday 20 April 2006 11:21, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 19 April 2006 15:29, Mike Arthur <mike@×××××××××××××.uk> wrote |
3 |
> |
4 |
> about '[gentoo-amd64] Moving to no-multilib profile': |
5 |
> > Is there anything else I need to/should do before/after I move to the |
6 |
> > profile? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> If you use grub, prepare to abandon it in favor of either the binary |
9 |
> version or lilo, which has a binary blob anyway... |
10 |
> |
11 |
> From what I understand, it's either impossible or just extremely |
12 |
> impractical... something about initializing memory tables or the IOMMU |
13 |
> being required before you can switch to 64-bit mode... |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I've been up for almost 24 hours (without properly preparing) so I'm a |
16 |
> little fuzzy right now... |
17 |
Can grub not be compiled in 64-bit mode? |
18 |
Not a problem for me to use the binary, I just want to avoid the current |
19 |
situation of having loads of crap in lib32 and also a chroot with all the |
20 |
stuff repeated, which seems pretty pointless to me, until we can do emerge |
21 |
-arch x86 mplayer or whatever. |
22 |
|
23 |
Mike |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |