Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] x11-drm-20051223 failure - `SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED' undeclared
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:35:37
Message-Id: 5bdc1c8b0601120833r15ed1c19p78cf746ed2395e80@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] x11-drm-20051223 failure - `SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED' undeclared by Richard Fish
1 On 1/11/06, Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> wrote:
2 > On 1/11/06, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote:
3 > > I took a quick look at Bugzilla but didn't see anything that
4 > > matched up. Does this work with the Gentoo kernel?
5 >
6 > Builds fine here against suspend2-sources-2.6.15
7
8 Interesting kernel choice. I hadn't heard of it. Where does that one
9 come from? It's in portage I see. Is this a Gentoo developed kernel or
10 from some outside working group?
11
12 >
13 > > Any other ideas?
14 > >
15 > > Older versions of x11-drm did emerge correctly:
16 > >
17 > > lightning ~ # eix x11-drm
18 > > * x11-base/x11-drm
19 > > Available versions: !4.3.0-r7 20050502 20050807 20051028 20051223
20 > > Installed: 20050807
21 >
22 > You are saying x11-drm 20050807 built against 2.6.15??? Or that
23 > 20050807 built against some earlier kernel version (which is what I
24 > suspect you really meant to say!)
25
26 No, the earlier version was built against something earlier.
27
28 >
29 > I would say try an earlier/later/different kernel or rt patch version.
30
31 Cheers,
32 Mark
33
34 >
35 > -Richard
36 >
37 > --
38 > gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list
39 >
40 >
41
42 --
43 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies