1 |
On 1/11/06, Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> On 1/11/06, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > I took a quick look at Bugzilla but didn't see anything that |
4 |
> > matched up. Does this work with the Gentoo kernel? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Builds fine here against suspend2-sources-2.6.15 |
7 |
|
8 |
Interesting kernel choice. I hadn't heard of it. Where does that one |
9 |
come from? It's in portage I see. Is this a Gentoo developed kernel or |
10 |
from some outside working group? |
11 |
|
12 |
> |
13 |
> > Any other ideas? |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Older versions of x11-drm did emerge correctly: |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > lightning ~ # eix x11-drm |
18 |
> > * x11-base/x11-drm |
19 |
> > Available versions: !4.3.0-r7 20050502 20050807 20051028 20051223 |
20 |
> > Installed: 20050807 |
21 |
> |
22 |
> You are saying x11-drm 20050807 built against 2.6.15??? Or that |
23 |
> 20050807 built against some earlier kernel version (which is what I |
24 |
> suspect you really meant to say!) |
25 |
|
26 |
No, the earlier version was built against something earlier. |
27 |
|
28 |
> |
29 |
> I would say try an earlier/later/different kernel or rt patch version. |
30 |
|
31 |
Cheers, |
32 |
Mark |
33 |
|
34 |
> |
35 |
> -Richard |
36 |
> |
37 |
> -- |
38 |
> gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |