| 1 |
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 19:45 +0200, Beso wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> for what i know on dual core 1000 isn't suited cause it makes the |
| 6 |
> system unstable.... the suggested is 100 or max 250 if you want a low |
| 7 |
> latency desktop.... also, the 1000 on single core 64bit is very |
| 8 |
> unsable and the processore state has a very great shift around.... i |
| 9 |
> experimented that single core amd64 should have the best timer freq or |
| 10 |
> 250 for a normal desktop and a dual core amd64 should have 100.... but |
| 11 |
> anyone is free to try and use other freqs as they like most.... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
FTR, I've run nothing but 1000 (except for testing) for a very long time |
| 15 |
now on all my amd64 boxes (single, dual-core, dual CPU and dual-core |
| 16 |
dual CPU) with no stability problems. In every test I've done, response |
| 17 |
and latency was better for 1000, and throughput was not measurably |
| 18 |
worse. I cannot recommend anything but 1000 for a desktop system |
| 19 |
(unless you can go tickless). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Obviously, for something like this, it's largely subjective. That's why |
| 22 |
the option is there. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Daniel |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives