1 |
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Hi folks, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I recently built me a new 64 bit system. My old 32 bit system has 2Gbs and |
5 |
> my new system has 4Gbs. I was expecting it to use about the same amount of |
6 |
> memory but noticed it uses a good bit more on the new system than the old |
7 |
> one. With just the normal stuff open, I use about 1.5Gbs of ram. My old |
8 |
> system would use a little over half that. I have the same settings on |
9 |
> both. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Is this difference because 64 bit programs use more memory, maybe they are |
12 |
> larger than 32 bit programs? Just curious. I notice that Seamonkey uses |
13 |
> more and KDE's plasma-desktop uses more. Those are generally the biggest |
14 |
> users. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I'm not complaining about the usage, just curious as to why the difference. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Dale |
19 |
> |
20 |
> :-) :-) |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
Hi Dale, |
25 |
That seems way high to me but I cannot do a real comparison here as |
26 |
I haven't had a 32-bit X86 machine in 4-5 years. My current box is |
27 |
tied up running 3 copies of Windows at the moment and is using pretty |
28 |
much 12GB at the moment so I'd have to reboot to take any reading. |
29 |
However I seem to remember only 350MB being used right at the point of |
30 |
logging into KDE, but I could be wrong about that. |
31 |
|
32 |
Maybe post a few numbers: |
33 |
|
34 |
1) What is used when you first start KDE |
35 |
2) The additions for a few common apps. |
36 |
|
37 |
I'd be happy to compare mine to yours later today. |
38 |
|
39 |
- Mark |