| 1 |
2008/6/1 Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Samstag, 31. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Saturday 31 May 2008 20:25:42 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > New in pkgcore: |
| 6 |
> > > --ignore-failures: |
| 7 |
> > > [snip] |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > people who asked for a similar functionality in paludis were called |
| 10 |
> > > stupid. (asking for skipfirst equivalent) |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > [dleverton@shiny-one ~] $ paludis --help |
| 13 |
> > [snip] |
| 14 |
> > --continue-on-failure Whether to continue after a fetch or install |
| 15 |
> error |
| 16 |
> > if-fetch-only If fetching only (default) |
| 17 |
> > never Never |
| 18 |
> > if-satisfied If remaining packages' dependencies are |
| 19 |
> > satisfied if-independent If independent of failed and skipped |
| 20 |
> > packages always Always (UNSAFE) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> oh, cool. After calling everybody stupid and retarded who asked for |
| 23 |
> something |
| 24 |
> like that, they finally implemented it. That is what I call adult |
| 25 |
> behaviour. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
well, yours is equal.... it seems that the explanation of how the |
| 30 |
continue-on-failure works and on what differences (noticeable ones) are |
| 31 |
between the 2 flags hasn't reached your mind. you who continue to just flame |
| 32 |
against a piece of software just because it has been done by someone you |
| 33 |
don't like, without even considering its good and bad sides are no less than |
| 34 |
the ones you just look down on. it was you who has brought out the flame |
| 35 |
when it wasn't necessary and when i was replying to a duncan's question |
| 36 |
which had nothing to do with flames and shouldn't bother package installers |
| 37 |
behaviour. and everytime the things would have taken the road to calm down |
| 38 |
you would just get out with other flames. it seems that you like a lot |
| 39 |
flaming... well, maybe it's time to settle down a little and if you want to |
| 40 |
flame post another thread with flame paludis vs other world as subject and |
| 41 |
flame there. whoever reads the subject of the thread would not think to see |
| 42 |
a flame between paludis and portage. |
| 43 |
thanks. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
dott. ing. beso |
Archives