Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric@×××××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Possible Math Problem - Request For Verification
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:22:44
Message-Id: 20110626192111.GA23315@crud
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Possible Math Problem - Request For Verification by Volker Armin Hemmann
Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> skribis:
> ok, I tried ekopath: > > UCBFAIL indicates problems! > /tmp/usbtest/ccos_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in COS(X) at line 444 for generic > /tmp/usbtest/cexp_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in EXP(X) at line 444 for generic > /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in ceild at line 701 for double > /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in coshd at line 701 for double > /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in floord at line 701 for double > /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output:UCBFAIL clib_DP.output , 25 out of 25 tests > completed > /tmp/usbtest/csin_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in SIN(X) at line 444 for generic > > only 10 out of 14 show UCBPASS!
That must be what they mean by "Industry proven robustness and quality"

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Possible Math Problem - Request For Verification Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Possible Math Problem - Request For Verification Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>