Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Possible Math Problem - Request For Verification
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:50:21
Message-Id: BANLkTim-X05Te3By=+fhH4H6k7TTtAzq6w@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Possible Math Problem - Request For Verification by Barry Schwartz
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Barry Schwartz
<chemoelectric@×××××××××××××.org> wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> skribis: >> ok, I tried ekopath: >> >> UCBFAIL indicates problems! >> /tmp/usbtest/ccos_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in COS(X) at line 444 for generic >> /tmp/usbtest/cexp_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in EXP(X) at line 444 for generic >> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in ceild at line 701 for double >> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in coshd at line 701 for double >> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in floord at line 701 for double >> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output:UCBFAIL clib_DP.output , 25 out of 25 tests >> completed >> /tmp/usbtest/csin_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in SIN(X) at line 444 for generic >> >> only 10 out of 14 show UCBPASS! > > That must be what they mean by "Industry proven robustness and > quality"
Do you have any info about _any_ system passing this 100% successfully? What about that the code itself might have a bug in it? - Mark

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Possible Math Problem - Request For Verification Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net>