1 |
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:02:44 -0400 |
2 |
John P. Burkett wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Duncan wrote: |
5 |
> > "John P. Burkett" <burkett@×××.edu> posted 4A3EAC43.30004@×××.edu, |
6 |
> > excerpted below, on Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:55:15 -0400: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> >> hank you David. Doing |
9 |
> >> emerge =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r2 produced the following |
10 |
> >> response |
11 |
> >> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy |
12 |
> >> "=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r2" |
13 |
> >> |
14 |
> >> I also tried |
15 |
> >> emerge -s gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r2-osmp and a few other variations |
16 |
> >> without finding any ebuilds. |
17 |
|
18 |
The "-osmp" indicates a "local version". The proper source for your |
19 |
kernel is 2.6.22-r2. |
20 |
|
21 |
If you grep your .config, you'll see the "-osmp" text. |
22 |
|
23 |
> >> |
24 |
> >> Ideas about how to emerge the sources would be very welcome. |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > Try epkginfo gentoo-sources |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > That should give you a list of all available versions and their |
29 |
> > keyword status, among other info (as long as you have gentoolkit |
30 |
> > installed, tho older gentoolkits might not include it as I think |
31 |
> > it's a newer addition). It looks like there's no longer a |
32 |
> > gentoo-sources-2.6.22 version in the tree. I haven't synced in a |
33 |
> > few days so the list I get may be slightly outdated, but here, |
34 |
> > there's a version jump from 2.6.16 (which was maintained as a |
35 |
> > long-term stable version for quite some time) to 2.6.25, then at |
36 |
> > least one revision of each kernel from there thru 30, the latest. |
37 |
> Thank you, Duncan. Doing epkginfo gentoo-sources on my machine |
38 |
> confirms your observations. |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
Not sure if it's relevant, but all ati-driver ebuilds after 8.552-r3 |
42 |
have a kernel version check and won't build with 2.6.29 or newer. The |
43 |
check is in the following lines: |
44 |
|
45 |
if kernel_is ge 2 6 29; then |
46 |
die "${P} is not yet compatible with 2.6.29 kernels. See bug #264021." |
47 |
fi |
48 |
|
49 |
So, for the time being, I'm sticking with 2.6.28 and abandoning efforts |
50 |
to use 2.6.30. |
51 |
|
52 |
Regards, |
53 |
|
54 |
David |