Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: David Relson <relson@×××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Cc: burkett@×××.edu
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: emerge -eav system failed with ati-drivers
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:46:10
Message-Id: 20090621204606.16860438@osage.osagesoftware.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: emerge -eav system failed with ati-drivers by "John P. Burkett"
1 On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:02:44 -0400
2 John P. Burkett wrote:
3
4 > Duncan wrote:
5 > > "John P. Burkett" <burkett@×××.edu> posted 4A3EAC43.30004@×××.edu,
6 > > excerpted below, on Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:55:15 -0400:
7 > >
8 > >> hank you David. Doing
9 > >> emerge =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r2 produced the following
10 > >> response
11 > >> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy
12 > >> "=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r2"
13 > >>
14 > >> I also tried
15 > >> emerge -s gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r2-osmp and a few other variations
16 > >> without finding any ebuilds.
17
18 The "-osmp" indicates a "local version". The proper source for your
19 kernel is 2.6.22-r2.
20
21 If you grep your .config, you'll see the "-osmp" text.
22
23 > >>
24 > >> Ideas about how to emerge the sources would be very welcome.
25 > >
26 > > Try epkginfo gentoo-sources
27 > >
28 > > That should give you a list of all available versions and their
29 > > keyword status, among other info (as long as you have gentoolkit
30 > > installed, tho older gentoolkits might not include it as I think
31 > > it's a newer addition). It looks like there's no longer a
32 > > gentoo-sources-2.6.22 version in the tree. I haven't synced in a
33 > > few days so the list I get may be slightly outdated, but here,
34 > > there's a version jump from 2.6.16 (which was maintained as a
35 > > long-term stable version for quite some time) to 2.6.25, then at
36 > > least one revision of each kernel from there thru 30, the latest.
37 > Thank you, Duncan. Doing epkginfo gentoo-sources on my machine
38 > confirms your observations.
39
40
41 Not sure if it's relevant, but all ati-driver ebuilds after 8.552-r3
42 have a kernel version check and won't build with 2.6.29 or newer. The
43 check is in the following lines:
44
45 if kernel_is ge 2 6 29; then
46 die "${P} is not yet compatible with 2.6.29 kernels. See bug #264021."
47 fi
48
49 So, for the time being, I'm sticking with 2.6.28 and abandoning efforts
50 to use 2.6.30.
51
52 Regards,
53
54 David