Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Beso <givemesugarr@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is it possible to get rid of firefox?
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:20:48
Message-Id: d257c3560811191120k4d7d730ap42fe6f6cf3af19d@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is it possible to get rid of firefox? by Michael Moore
1 2008/11/19 Michael Moore <mikem.unet@×××××.com>:
2 > On 20:19 Tue 18 Nov , Beso wrote:
3 >> firefox-bin is worse than firefox on an amd64 system. so, if you think
4 >> that a bin version would be faster than a non bin version you're quite
5 >> wrong.
6 >
7 > Apologies guys if i didn't make it clear. I wanted to remove firefox.
8 > The -bin version i was talking of, was the xulrunner-bin package. And,
9 > by the way i agree that the bin version is really worse-off than
10 > firefox.
11 >
12 >> opera for what i know on amd64 is compiled for 64bit and not
13 >> for 32 bit and so the plugins you're using with also need to be amd64
14 >> compiled.
15 >
16 > If you disable the "ia32" use flag. Unless ofcourse, if you are talking
17 > of no-multilib profile. IIRC 64-bit support was made available for opera
18 > sometime in the past few months (somewhere along the 9.x series).
19
20 this is the reason why i've said that having a 64bit plugin is necessary.
21
22 >> said this i suggest you to use mplayerplug-in instead of
23 >> gecko-mediaplayer. since it's produced by the same devs of mplayer and
24 >> you won't have api problems with it. another reason for you to use
25 >> mplayerplug-in is that it works with latest xulrunner and firefox
26 >> codebase (it's not limited to second version of firefox) and you can
27 >> use either the latest xulrunner, seamonkey or firefox (still
28 >> maintained by mozilla). on multilib systems it also automatically
29 >> builds the 32bit and 64bit packages depending on mplayer and
30 >> mplayer-bin.
31 >> also xulrunner is a direct dependency for firefox and if a package
32 >> tells you that you can build that package on xulrunner then you don't
33 >> really need firefox.
34 >>
35 >> --
36 >> dott. ing. beso
37 >
38 > I would love to use mplayerplug-in, only i wish it worked well for me.
39 > I would be glad if somebody could please suggest the process to get
40 > mplayerplug-in working with opera. My issues have been that i dont get
41 > the control buttons working and that is after i have employed a few
42 > hooks to enable the plugin. FWIW the erstwhile gentoo-wiki page (i dont
43 > the current status) on opera also suggested to use gecko-mediaplayer.
44 >
45
46
47 last time i've tried out opera and mplayerplug-in i didn't have any
48 problems, if not with wma files that are still not supported on linux.
49
50 --
51 dott. ing. beso