1 |
Andrei Slavoiu wrote: |
2 |
> --- Bob Young <BYoung@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> That's a very shallow definition of the "essence of |
4 |
>> freedom," from the |
5 |
>> perspective of most end users, your scenario doesn't |
6 |
>> really change anything. |
7 |
>> From the end users perspective s/he is still |
8 |
>> dependent on someone else to |
9 |
>> make the changes. I wouldn't say having a choice of |
10 |
>> who to be dependent upon |
11 |
>> actually qualifies as "freedom." |
12 |
> Nobody needs to depend on anybody for their coding! |
13 |
> Programmers are not a secret society that hold their |
14 |
> ways secret! If you don't find anybody to do it for |
15 |
> you, or if you don't want to pay for that, then you |
16 |
> can buy a copy of "Programming for Dummies" or "Teach |
17 |
> yourself C++ in 10 minutes" (note that if any of this |
18 |
> books really exist, it is a simple coincidence). |
19 |
> So everybody HAS the freedom. If somebody is too lazy |
20 |
> to learn how to use it, it's their own fault. |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
You absolutely do have to depend on someone else for their coding - |
24 |
unless you fork it, or upstream actually accepts your patch. If you |
25 |
fork it then there is a whole new ball of wax, and I am sorry but |
26 |
"Programming for Dummies" and "Teach yourself C++ in 10 minutes" (just |
27 |
to steal your examples) will not teach you the coding skills that you |
28 |
actually need for the opensource world - as they typically are written |
29 |
for.... Windows... yay... but - the only issue I have with Windows being |
30 |
called slaveryware or whatever, is that means that you have absolutely |
31 |
no choice whatsoever in using it - and while that may be the case where |
32 |
some people work (I am lucky in that where I work they are extremely |
33 |
opensource friendly, and I only have 1 machine out of 7 that actually |
34 |
requires Windows be on it - gah, I keep going way off my path... ok, |
35 |
lets try this again...) |
36 |
|
37 |
Slaveryware by a very literal term, means you are being forced to use |
38 |
it, and the fact that you have a choice, you CAN use Free/Open Souce |
39 |
software, negates that it actually is slaveryware because no one forces |
40 |
you to use it, it is personal choice. I keep a Windows machine around |
41 |
at home, but in no way do I feel like I have to have it. It is simply |
42 |
there, yes, I can scratch my own itches, and by virtue of becoming a |
43 |
Gentoo dev, I have decided to help others scratch their itches too, but |
44 |
that is what open source is all about. Scratching an itch, and if you |
45 |
don't have the ability to scratch your own, you ARE dependent on others |
46 |
to do the scratching for you, UNTIL you have the ability to do it on |
47 |
your own. Either way, you ARE shifting who you are dependent on for the |
48 |
relief from the itch. |
49 |
-- |
50 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |