| 1 |
Hi, if I cannot get grub towork. How do I go-about making the change to |
| 2 |
lilo? |
| 3 |
Thanks |
| 4 |
Gavin. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Nuitari wrote: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> I finally switched my only grub system to lilo yesterday. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, William Tetrault wrote: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 13:24:30 -0600 |
| 14 |
>> From: William Tetrault <xcourse97@×××××××.net> |
| 15 |
>> Reply-To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o |
| 16 |
>> To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o |
| 17 |
>> Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] initrd |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> I too have been on the amd64 platform since early last year, and am |
| 20 |
>> still |
| 21 |
>> using grub-static, although I know that grub now compiles fine for this |
| 22 |
>> platform (at least, that is what I've heard - I'm still using |
| 23 |
>> grub-static). |
| 24 |
>> But whether one uses grub or grub-static, the installed files are the |
| 25 |
>> same, |
| 26 |
>> and grub works the same regardless of which is chosen. My grub.conf |
| 27 |
>> has not |
| 28 |
>> changed from when I was using Athlon XP's (although it's no longer |
| 29 |
>> called |
| 30 |
>> grub.lst). |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
>> On Sunday 30 October 2005 12:07 pm, Dmitri Pogosyan wrote: |
| 33 |
>> |
| 34 |
>>> Actually, that reminds me that a year ago on amd64 architecture the |
| 35 |
>>> compiled grub did not work for me (it did compile but fail to boot) |
| 36 |
>>> and I |
| 37 |
>>> had to use grub-static-0.93, which worked fine. I looked now and |
| 38 |
>>> see that |
| 39 |
>>> I still use this version of grub on all my amd64 machines. |
| 40 |
>>> |
| 41 |
>>> |
| 42 |
>>> |
| 43 |
>>> -- |
| 44 |
>>> Dmitri Pogosyan Department of Physics |
| 45 |
>>> Associate Professor University of Alberta |
| 46 |
>>> tel 1-780-492-2150 412 Avadh Bhatia Physics Labs |
| 47 |
>>> fax 1-780-492-0714 Edmonton, AB, T6G 2J1, CANADA |
| 48 |
>> |
| 49 |
>> |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
-- |
| 52 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives