| 1 |
Brett McCoy wrote: |
| 2 |
> Sampo Savolainen wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> I'm interested in trying out the Tranzport control surface... is Ardour |
| 5 |
>>> 2.0 stable enough for doing some basic experimentation? |
| 6 |
>> That depends on your gtk version. With gtk+ 2.8.x, ardour2 crashes randomly. |
| 7 |
>> I'm still trying to get to the bottom of the problem, but that's another story. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> If you are running gtk+ 2.6.x you should be fine. There is still an issue |
| 10 |
>> with the tranzport implementation. libusb seems to be a bit too simple for |
| 11 |
>> the tranzport. This causes some erratic behaviour like ardour not being able |
| 12 |
>> to catch all button presses sent from the tranzport. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> We are quite confident that we will (= Paul will) get this fixed, but as it |
| 15 |
>> needs changes to libusb and possibly even the kernel, we just have to wait. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> On the other hand, the tranzport does work already, and it's pretty darn |
| 18 |
>> coold! :) |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Not sure what gtk+ version I have... whatever the latest is in Gentoo, I |
| 21 |
> guess. :-) I haven't built 2.0 in a while nor even tried doing any |
| 22 |
> recording with it yet.... but it looks so slick! |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> -- Brett |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
anyone knows about ebuild for ardour2-cvs ? ehm, for amd64 too. :) |
| 27 |
thanks |
| 28 |
michalz |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives