1 |
2008/2/12, Mateusz Mierzwinski <mateuszmierzwinski@××.pl>: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Beso pisze: |
4 |
> > i recently put portage on tmpfs and i'm happy about it since i got a |
5 |
> > nice speedup in compilation, but i get an issue: tmpfs is only 450mb |
6 |
> > long. |
7 |
> > is there a way to increase it?!?! |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > -- |
10 |
> > dott. ing. beso |
11 |
> Well, You should remove distfiles in portage tree after compilation. All |
12 |
> downloaded files are placed in distfiles directory, and this can take |
13 |
> Your free space. Also if You need to compile only some part of packages, |
14 |
> You can make bindings for some packeges and only a part of portage tree |
15 |
> store in tmpfs, and part bind by "mount -o bind" or "ln -sf" into tmpfs |
16 |
> tree from normal fs. Also I must warn You, that tmpfs is not good idea |
17 |
> to place portage tree because of system dependency like /proc or /sys. |
18 |
> Tmpfs is SHM. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Greetings |
21 |
> Mateusz M. |
22 |
> -- |
23 |
> gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
i didn't put portage tree on tmpfs, but just portage compilation directory. |
27 |
even distfiles aren't on tmpfs since i don't want to download distfiles |
28 |
everytime i compile something. the problem is that it's too small for |
29 |
certain packages like kdelibs and other big ones. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
dott. ing. beso |