| 1 |
I assume by stable you mean that applicants can not be using a system |
| 2 |
that uses ~amd64 packages, right? (Just want a little clarification) |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 7/12/05, Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> Hi all, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Currently, it is nearly impossible to have a pure stable system with |
| 8 |
> Gentoo/AMD64. I think everybody who has ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64 in his |
| 9 |
> make.conf also has a rather large list of packages in |
| 10 |
> /etc/portage/packages.keywords. To adress this issue, we need either a |
| 11 |
> massive improvement in amount of menpower or a list of packages we can |
| 12 |
> to focus on. If you run a stable system and you're interested in helping |
| 13 |
> us from a long-term point of view, you could get in contact with hparker |
| 14 |
> (hparker@g.o), our Arch Testers Lead. If you don't know what Arch |
| 15 |
> Testers aka ATs are, you probably want to read this doc [1] first. |
| 16 |
> However, if you don't want to become an AT, but still want to contribute |
| 17 |
> something to the development, please email me the content of your |
| 18 |
> /etc/portage/package.keywords to blubb@g.o. The data will only be |
| 19 |
> used to create a list of packages which are considered more important |
| 20 |
> than others. It will *not* be used for any other type of statistics, the |
| 21 |
> whole procedure will be totally anonymous. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Thanks in advance! |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/tests/index.xml?part=1&chap=1 |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> -- |
| 28 |
> Simon Stelling |
| 29 |
> Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead |
| 30 |
> blubb@g.o |
| 31 |
> -- |
| 32 |
> gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives