1 |
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 11:28:10 -0700 |
3 |
> Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Frank stated it's the 'default', but |
7 |
>> I guess it's really only the default for new installs. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> See these links: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-870799-start-0.html |
13 |
> |
14 |
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-921342.html |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> There is no problem with the latest libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0-r2. I am |
18 |
> just wondering why the sudden drop of the ABI's. The legacy |
19 |
> libjpeg has gone on to ABI 9 whereas libjpeg-turbo is reverting |
20 |
> to the ancient ABI 6. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Frank Peters |
23 |
|
24 |
Thanks for the links Frank. |
25 |
|
26 |
I also have some deep, dark recollection of a news item about this |
27 |
topic which likely I didn't pay a lot of attention to. I'll probably |
28 |
update a machine today and make sure there's no obvious problems here |
29 |
before I do my important machines. |
30 |
|
31 |
And I do understand that you weren't saying there was a problem - only |
32 |
that you were having to rebuild a lot of stuff so you were looking for |
33 |
background on why. |
34 |
|
35 |
Cheers, |
36 |
Mark |