Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo AMD64 <gentoo-amd64@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Libjpeg-Turbo Drops Newer ABIs
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 19:17:41
Message-Id: CAK2H+eek6y0nvPrbCDKjN=9NqZ449Qk_d5A5P7+-iq2gtUpWcQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Libjpeg-Turbo Drops Newer ABIs by Frank Peters
1 On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> wrote:
2 > On Fri, 2 Aug 2013 11:28:10 -0700
3 > Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >
5 >>
6 >> Frank stated it's the 'default', but
7 >> I guess it's really only the default for new installs.
8 >>
9 >
10 > See these links:
11 >
12 > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-870799-start-0.html
13 >
14 > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-921342.html
15 >
16 >
17 > There is no problem with the latest libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0-r2. I am
18 > just wondering why the sudden drop of the ABI's. The legacy
19 > libjpeg has gone on to ABI 9 whereas libjpeg-turbo is reverting
20 > to the ancient ABI 6.
21 >
22 > Frank Peters
23
24 Thanks for the links Frank.
25
26 I also have some deep, dark recollection of a news item about this
27 topic which likely I didn't pay a lot of attention to. I'll probably
28 update a machine today and make sure there's no obvious problems here
29 before I do my important machines.
30
31 And I do understand that you weren't saying there was a problem - only
32 that you were having to rebuild a lot of stuff so you were looking for
33 background on why.
34
35 Cheers,
36 Mark