Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-amd64@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Emerging package as both 64 and 32 bit | ||
| Date: | Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:34:16 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20061218093131.73994121@krikkit.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-amd64] Re: Emerging package as both 64 and 32 bit by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:41:16 +0000 (UTC), Duncan wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > there's little reason to do 32-bit at all, here, except to keep |
| 4 | > from having to use the grub binary package. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | What's wrong with the GRUB source package? I remember using grub-static |
| 7 | when I first went 64 bit, but haven't used it for ages. The only 32 bit |
| 8 | stuff I use here is firefox-bin and vmware. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Neil Bothwick |
| 13 | |
| 14 | I just took an IQ test. The results were negative. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Emerging package as both 64 and 32 bit | Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> |