Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Ian McCulloch <ianmcc@××××××××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:38:17
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.61.0507240733540.27896@aclx24.physik.rwth-aachen.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] x86_64 optimization patches for glibc. by Matt Randolph
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Matt Randolph wrote:

> Sean Johnson wrote: > > > LOL! > > That must be for the folk that don't mind patching glibc, but will get > > upset if memcpy does strange things. :) > > > > > > You try to do a good turn and they laugh at you. That'll teach me.
Heh ;-) I would like to see a version of memcpy.c that DOES do something malicious, without being completely obvious. This isn't Windows, a seg-fault isn't going to take down the kernel, or corrupt the filesystem;) Cheers Ian -- gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] x86_64 optimization patches for glibc. Jared Lindsay <cinder.sub@×××××.com>